In addition, all top-level variables that you declared in your JavaScript will be included in the keys array. You can ignore the context top-level variable, for it is not a binding, nor is it used in the context of this writing. In JavaScript, this represents execution context, and you will see all variables defined in the top-level scope. The httpClient and logger objects are universally available for all script types. You may notice that some bindings are specific to the script type and some are present in both outputs. In further examples in this writing, this “noise” will be mostly omitted.įor another example, the top-level variables present in OAuth2 Access Token Modification Script: ERROR: httpClient,identity,session,logger,context,scopes,accessToken You may encounter some less than useful messages from the scripting engine in the debug output, like the first line displayed above. S.A.46ae269c-0403-4979-a224-31a67a91e51a: 11:07:37,549: Thread: TransactionIdĮRROR: auditEntryDetail,httpClient,requestHeaders,sharedState,logger,requestParameters,context,callbacks,realm,transientState,idRepository JavaScript logger.error(Object.keys(this)) For example, for a Scripted Decision Node script in AM 7.0: What you see will depend on the script type. You can output all available bindings by using the logger object methods. Others, however, are not as descriptive and rely on the developer’s knowledge. Some may even explicitly state what bindings are available for example, the OIDC Claims Script and OAuth2 Access Token Modification Script templates have a list of bindings in a commented section at the top. Some of the script templates included in an AM installation (and serving as defaults for the script types) have references to the variables used in the script. The bindings exist in a script as top-level variables and provide the data available to the script, the objects to interact with, and the placeholders to communicate back to the core AM functionality. Decision node script for authentication trees (Scripted Decision Node)īefore you write a single line in your script, some of its context is already defined via bindings.You can always return to the Contents by selecting the Back to Contents links provided at the beginning of each section in this document. It starts with common components and gets into specifics when the script language, script type, or runtime conditions introduce them. The content of this article is structured as an overview of the scripting environment in AM. When you create a script under Realms > Realm Name > Scripts, however, you make choices that will have some additional effect on the functionality available from the script.įuthermore, the environment in which AM is deployed may affect the configuration and debugging options during script development. All scripts in AM have access to Debug Logging and Accessing HTTP Services. The Scripting API Functionality available for a server-side script will depend on its application and context. While developing scripts, also check for solutions in the constantly growing ForgeRock Knowledge Base. This article aims to complement the currently available and ever-improving official docs, and provide additional insights into evaluating and debugging scripts at runtime. But, it also allows for rapid development for the purpose of demonstration and testing without the need to change and recompile AM's core. Scripting in AM extends its authentication, authorization, and federation capabilities. Updated on : added OAuth2 Access Token Modification script type Notes on Scripting in ForgeRock Access Management (AM) 7.0 The only problem is with Safari over HTTPS with POST request.Summary An overview of the scripting environment in AM The POST request seems not to be sent at all: Īs written before - it works good on Safari over HTTP and it also works on another browsers both over HTTP and HTTPS. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh Intel Mac OS X 10_13_3) AppleWebKit/604.5.6 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/11.0.3 Safari/604.5.6Īccess-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type, X-CSRF-Token, X-Requested-With, Accept, Accept-Version, Content-Length, Content-MD5, Date, X-Api-Version, X-File-NameĪccess-Control-Request-Method: GET,POST,OPTIONS The preflight OPTIONS request is following:Īccess-Control-Request-Headers: content-type XMLHttpRequest cannot load due to access control checks. Failed to load resource: Origin is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin. Origin is not allowed by Access-Control-Allow-Origin. It affects only POST requests (GET and OPTIONS works fine) on Safari over HTTPS. It doesn't occur on Safari over HTTP neither. This problem doesn't occur neither on Chrome nor Firefox.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |